|
i remember back in the day. 1997-1999, particularly. seasons. first loves. rock and roll and a certain album. dizzy up the girl by the goo goo dolls. this album is a part of me. i fell in love to it, stole it when i was a kid. played it everywhere. took shit from church goers who said it was a dark, dreary, secular record. the hell of it is, i can still sit down and listen to this album and feel the things i felt back then, to a lesser degree. nevertheless, i can tap back into then and there to some degree. i remember being in new york city on a tour bus riding through Manhattan with dizzy up the girl spinning in my walkman. yes we had cd players back when i was growing up. the record is pure genius and it is hard to believe that it is nearly 11 years old. this album is tied as my favorite album of all time with SWIM by july for kings. nothing can touch these 2 albums. and i cant say one is my favorite or that i love one more than the other. i have to have them both with me. i will be buried with a copy of each of these albums. im sick and tired of people trying to change what i think about certain things. i am a staunch supporter of Israel and their war against islamic parasitic terrorists. yet, i am supposed to be some pacifist pussy who attempts to understand why they fire rockets into israel and kill innocent jews (citizens). all the while, the state of Israel is somehow to blame for all this... its a crock of shit. i am getting ready to embark on a long paper about this and i am sure my main professor will attempt to sway my paper's content. some things never change. it has appeared to me that the far left wing 'progressivism' spewed on college campuses doesnt exist anywhere else in the world except for on these campuses. its a self-sustaining cycle of shit that doesnt work in the world. marxism does NOT work. in theory, it is lovely. but in practice, it isnt possible. you cant tell this to some of these far left fools because they are merely the offspring of a terrible, disgraceful time in this nation where people were against war and the united states and hated those of us in the military. well i say to hell with all of you. if you dont support the people (military) who keep you free and give you the right to feel the way you do and spew anti-american rhetoric, then get the hell out of this country and give your citizenship to a mexican who will gladly give his right arm to become a legal citizen of this nation. |
|
First of all, let me clear up some of those ugly stereotypes about anarchist ideology. Let me start by saying that anarchy does not equal a society without morals, nor does anarchist philosophy encourage violence or disregard for the rights of others. An anarchist society is simply a society without laws. It has no laws because it doesn't need them. It is a place where everyone is moral enough to respect each others' rights. It is a society that does not accept a power structure that can impose its will over the masses. No matter how perfect a government, we all know that those in power can and will become corrupt and abuse their power. A government without corruption could only exist in an ideal world; but if we are talking about an ideal world, then why even bring government into it in the first place? Since government will always be corrupt in a less than ideal world, we should work to make this an ideal world so we can do away with government. We should not accept power structures that try to solve problems from lofty seats of authority. When we assign government leaders the duty of "fixing" society, we become lazy and apathetic. We may be able to pursue our temporal delights undisturbed, but in the meantime, the abuse of power becomes more severe, and the injustice that it brings about grows steadily. This is why we should not blindly accept the authority of the power structures around us, nor should we depend on them to solve society's problems. Rather, we should work from the ground up, on the individual level, to transform society as a whole so we can create a society where it is easy to be good and moral. This is where the Christian aspect comes in. Christ taught that we should love our neighbor and treat him/her with respect. This spirit of charity has the potential to transform society. A society that practices charity is a society without injustice, and a society without injustice is an ideal world - a world that needs no government. One might ask how someone could draw anarchist ideology from Christian idealogy. We can clearly see the answer to this in the life of Jesus Christ himself. Christ did not blindly accept the authority of the chief priests and scribes (who had most of the authority in Hebrew society); instead, he questioned what they taught and how they viewed the old laws. In so doing, He introduced an entirely new and revolutionary way of thinking that emphasized the importance of love over law. Christ saw that the chief priests and scribes were over-emphasizing the law itself and were using it to gain power for themselves. They had lost all sight of the original purpose of those laws. Thus, the laws had lost their effectiveness, because they had been corrupted. Form had taken precedence over function. Because of this, Christ used a new approach and directed his teachings more towards following a charitable life. By concentrating His teachings on charity, He put function over form. He knew that to make the world a better place, change had to begin with the individual's heart, so He taught us HOW to be good people instead of giving us laws that one had to follow in order to be good. Christ taught his revolutionary message not only by preaching, but especially by example, and it is by living by Christ's example that we can bring about the most positive change. Think about it: if everyone lived by Christ's example, would there be a need for governments? While I realize that a world without governments is not likely, I still adhere to the belief that as believers in love and justice, we must always maintain a healthy cynicism when it comes to our dealings with the powers that govern our world. An anarchist philosophy has plenty of benefits for those living within a society with rigid structures and laws. Christian anarchist thought dictates that we always question, as Christ did, the powers that be. As in any situation, raising questions can only bring us closer to Truth. |
|
im about to blast im about to fuck it up im about to drop your mother's angel on the floor! im gonna do it fast, how am i to shut you up i got to free myself and quick im out the door i want you BLAST! i want you BLAST! |
|
She wanted to be a nun Until that fateful day we met I beat the crucifix In a game of Russian roulette I burned my Beatles records Because she hated number nine She licked rock cocaine suckers Laughed, said her moms doing mine well, are you an illusion, or am I just getting stoned Because I can't take it alone I can't take it alone I hope I didn't just give away the ending We started limping, Caught the handicap shuttle to town And yelled "God's healed us" As we ran off the bus the driver just frowned By the way this girl was sexy and she wouldn't touch you That may not be true But I said it so you'd feel involved with this song Are you an illusion Or am I just getting stoned Because I can't take it alone I can't take it alone I hope I didn't just give away the ending We caught a fey taxi driver I smiled the ride was free I felt like Amsterdam She wanted more drugs and maybe me I told her dealer I was broke He hired a camera man We did a porno film for coke I hear I'm big in Japan Are you an illusion Or am I just getting stoned Because I can't take it alone I can't take it alone I hope I didn't just give away the ending we went back to her kitchen Put the coke all in a can Tied up a T.V minister In walked her dad He started drinking coffee Too much sugar on the go He fell dead on the floor He thought the coke was sweet'n'low well are you an illusion Or am I just getting stoned Because I can't take it alone I can't take it alone I hope I didn't just give away the ending Boy was she upset but then she stole her dad's wallet and I drove him to the hospital To sell all of his donatable body parts And this is where she dies They brought the depressed junkie in She shot his Cyanide up I guess she thought it was errol flynn I'm blamed in the confusion The police being phoned I don't even love you We weren't even friends It's just that I can't take it alone Uh, huh I can't take it alone I hope I didn't just give away the ending! Aw Jesus, Ah shit I think I just gave away the ending...... |
|
The Revolution Theory holds that the creation and nature of the universe and all living things are best explained by a revolutionary process involving an infinite number of infinitely smaller revolutions, or alterations, of the substance of the universe. Revolution Theory is thus a scientific disagreement with competing theories of the creation of the universe, including, among others, the Theory of Evolution and the pseudoscientific Intelligent Design theory. Revolution Theory proponents, like all scientists, believe that science should be conducted objectively, without regard to the implications of its findings, and without philosophic or religious assumptions. Some people believe that this is particularly necessary in origins science because of its historical (and, thus, very subjective) nature, and because it is a science that can be perceived as impacting religion. However, like all true science, Revolution Theory is neutral with regard to religion. It is neither compatible with religion or incompatible with it. Revolution Theory makes no postulation as to whether the revolutions themselves are guided or unguided by any force, religious, intelligent or otherwise. Revolution Theory came about because of significant problems in both the Theory of Evolution and the Intelligent Design theory, which share many flaws. For example, neither theory provides any explanation whatsoever as to why humans like the taste of chocolate or appreciate fine art and music. There is no explanation in the Theory of Evolution as to how genes would code for chocolate or art, nor is there any indication of how random mutations (essentially chance) could bring about such tastes, since neither chocolate nor art contribute toward survival. Similarly, the postulation of an "intelligent designer" cannot explain why chocolate is fattening, why some people are allergic to chocolate, or why some people are blind or deaf and thus unable to appreciate visual arts and music. Further, since chocolate did not even exist until relatively recently in the time scale of the universe, an "intelligent designer" at the beginning of the universe could not possibly have pre-ordained a taste for chocolate. In summary, Revolution Theory is the only theory to date that answers all of the questions about the origin and nature of the universe and life itself with both scientific objectivity and constitutional neutrality. |