whistler - October 15th, 2005
(Repost) While I am always happy to see political discussion, I get concerned when the operators wish to remain anonymous. It makes one think that you are hiding from something, or have an agenda of your own. I believe this site would have much more credibility if you were upfront about who you are.

Jim Watts


Hi Jim,
If you go to profile here or about us on the home page you will see my info now.
Thanks,
Duane

anonymous - October 20th, 2005
Question: I would like to know what the cost is to run the West Vancouver polling (and advance polling) station. I was told by the Muni that those costs are not broken down. There has to be some paper trail...
Wendy Tabrett

anonymous - October 29th, 2005
Concerning the first posting, some of us are in positions where signing our names to our thoughts could mean employment suicide. While it would be nice to sign my name to statements the nature of a small town prohibits this. I'm grateful for the anonymity option. It is the only way I can have my say. No secret agendas on my plate, just a burning desire to share my comments while not running the risk of getting fired the next day.

whistler - October 29th, 2005
Good Point! And just part of the reason for me starting this forum. I was originally behind the scenes myself but as you see above a few were concerned about a ‘hidden agenda’ although I am not backing anyone. I just want to educate myself! Duane

anonymous - November 11th, 2005
Were Hugh O’Reilly endorsements appropriate? Did this help the candidates he endorsed, or was it the kiss of death? What would Whistler be like if some of Hugh’s radical choices were elected?

anonymous - November 12th, 2005
"I think..... a very grey, depressing world" as one councillor once remarked of Ken's view of the world!

anonymous - November 15th, 2005
The Boot:

The preservation of the Boot and Shoestring Lodge is a favourite topic in Whistler. While I think most people see its demise as a foregone conclusion (you can't stand in the way of "progress" there is a lot of passion and a lot of interest in saving it. I think it is short-sighted to bulldoze part of this town's heritage to make room for yet another condo development owned by wealthy foreigners to use on the occasional holiday. And the live music promoted by the Boot is a cultural component of this town on par with any other artistic venture. I think the Ballet is of questionable value, but that's irrelevant.

At the all-candidates' meeting tonight there was talk of both preserving the Boot and of the empty Larco space. Is it feasible to dismantle the Boot Pub and re-install it in part of the Larco space?

The locals' livingroom, especially one that regularly promotes live music (and other entertainment) would bring more locals and visitors into that part of town. Perhaps some of the Boot's character would be lost, but perhaps not.

A fundamental component of this town's history would be preserved, the landlord would make money on rent, and the locals would retain their livingroom.

Possible?

anonymous - November 17th, 2005
In the US federal election, because the two presidential candidates had similar positions on many issues, it was difficult for many to choose for whom to vote. A popular question to decide which candidate got the vote was:

With which candidate would you most like to have a beer?

I'd argue that all the front-running Whistler candidates will do a good job if they get elected. So with which candidate(s) would you like to sit down and have a casual beer? If everything else seems equal, vote for that person.

anonymous - November 17th, 2005
I'd like to know if we could get a radio station here in Whistler. Something good without ads that we would want to hear.

McCaul Balmer


ps-love the work this lad did www.freeradiowhistler.com